Moving chambers can be an important strategic decision in a barrister’s career.
It may provide access to different work, support a developing specialism or offer a better platform for the next stage of practice.
But even where the move makes complete professional sense, the financial transition may not be immediate.
Instructions can take time to build. Work completed before the move may continue to generate receipts through the previous chambers, while new instructions at the new set may not yet have translated into received income. Depending on the timing of the move, that can create a temporary dip in the figures.
If a mortgage application happens to fall within that period, the lender may see something very simple:
Income has fallen.
What the figures may not show is why.
A Chambers Move Can Disrupt The Timing Of Income
Barristers already have an income profile where work undertaken, fees billed and payments received do not necessarily fall neatly within the same period.
A move between chambers can make that timing more pronounced.
There may be work completed before the move that is still awaiting payment. There may be a period while instructions develop at the new set. And there may be new work already undertaken that has not yet become received income.
The accounting year end adds another variable.
If the move happens at the wrong point in the reporting cycle, one set of accounts can capture much of the disruption associated with the transition while capturing relatively little of what happens afterwards.
The accounts are not wrong.
But without the chronology behind them, they may provide an incomplete picture of the practice.
A Strategic Move Can Look Like A Declining Practice
Consider a barrister with an established practice and several years of strong earnings.
They move chambers.
The next set of accounts shows a material reduction.
From a lender’s perspective, that reduction reasonably requires explanation.
Has the practice weakened?
Are instructions falling?
Is the latest year now a better indication of sustainable income?
Or has the move created a temporary interruption in an otherwise established practice?
These are very different lending scenarios, even though the headline figures may initially look the same.
This is why a chambers move should not simply appear as a footnote within the application.
If it has materially affected the income being presented to the lender, it needs to form part of the explanation.
Moving Chambers Does Not Mean Starting Again
A barrister changing chambers has not suddenly become newly established.
There may be years of practice, historic earnings and professional experience behind the move.
What has changed is the environment in which that practice is being developed.
For mortgage purposes, the important task is connecting the established history with the current position.
When did the move take place?
Where does the lower accounting period sit in relation to it?
What did earnings look like beforehand?
What happened during the transition?
And, importantly, what has happened since?
The answers can help establish whether the latest figures reflect a lasting reduction in earnings or a particular period of disruption.
Sometimes The Accounting Year Catches The Worst Of The Transition
Timing can be particularly important where the chambers move happens close to the barrister’s accounting year end.
Imagine that much of the disruption falls within the final months of the year.
Existing receipts are beginning to reduce. The new practice is developing, but the work undertaken has not yet translated fully into payments.
The accounting period closes.
The next few months may show a very different picture, but those months are not yet reflected in the completed accounts.
For a mortgage lender relying heavily on historic figures, the latest year can therefore look materially weaker.
That does not mean it should be ignored.
It means the lender needs to understand what period those figures actually represent.
What Has Happened Since The Move?
Where the latest accounts include a period of transition, the current position can become particularly relevant.
Has the barrister established themselves within the new chambers?
How has the level of work developed?
What income has been received since the move?
What work has been undertaken?
What remains outstanding?
And is the practice recovering towards its previous level, exceeding it, or continuing at the lower level?
Depending on the lender and circumstances, chambers information may help provide further context around current activity, including work done, payments received and aged debt.
That can be particularly useful where the completed accounts and the current practice are showing different things.
The purpose is not to replace a weaker historic year with a more convenient figure.
It is to provide the lender with enough information to understand what has happened since that year ended.
A Lower Latest Year Still Matters
There is an important distinction between explaining a fall in income and explaining it away.
A chambers move does not automatically mean a lender will disregard a lower year.
Some lenders may place significant weight on the latest completed accounts. Others may have greater scope to consider more recent evidence and the circumstances surrounding the reduction.
And if earnings have genuinely settled at a lower level following the move, that is relevant to affordability.
The objective is therefore not to argue that every reduction associated with a chambers move is temporary.
It is to establish whether this particular one was.
That requires evidence.
The Chronology Can Be As Important As The Figures
For a barrister who has recently changed chambers, a clear chronology can make the application considerably easier to understand.
Established practice and historic earnings.
Move to new chambers.
Period of transition.
Impact on income.
Development of the practice since the move.
The supporting evidence then needs to substantiate that sequence.
This gives the underwriter more than a year-on-year comparison.
It explains why the figures moved and allows the lender to consider whether the latest completed year is representative of the barrister’s current position.
Do Not Automatically Assume You Need To Rebuild Two Years Of Accounts
A lower year following a chambers move can lead to an understandable conclusion:
“I need to wait until I have another one or two strong years before I apply for a mortgage.”
Sometimes waiting will be necessary. A longer track record may improve the available options, and the income still needs to support the borrowing being requested.
But it should not automatically be assumed.
Where the chambers move has a clear chronology and there is appropriate evidence showing how the practice has developed since, there may be lenders able to consider the wider circumstances.
Establishing that before postponing a property decision can be important.
Career Progression Does Not Always Produce A Straight Line In The Accounts
Barristers make career decisions with the longer term in mind.
Sometimes those decisions create short-term disruption.
Moving chambers can be one of them.
A barrister may accept a period of transition because the new set offers the right environment for the practice they want to develop. A mortgage lender, however, still needs to assess the income that can be evidenced today.
The role of specialist advice is to bring those two perspectives together without relying on assumptions about what the barrister might earn in the future.
At Henry Dannell, we look at the established practice, the timing of the chambers move, what caused the change in earnings and what the evidence shows has happened since.
From there, we can consider which lenders may be positioned to assess the circumstances appropriately and how the case should be presented.
Because a lower year following a chambers move matters. But before it is treated as evidence of a weaker practice, it is important to understand what actually caused it.
A mortgage is secured against your home. Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage or any other debt secured on it. Mortgage availability and lending are subject to individual circumstances, status and lender criteria.
